Posts

Avoiding Typical Pitfalls (not only) at TUM

This post is from Roman Haas (he was advised by Elmar in his Bachelor’s Thesis).

It focuses on more or less typical problems that appeared to him and his friends during our theses and how to avoid them. They are described by anti-patterns, i.e. there is always a description of a problem and a possible solution for it. The problems are sorted by the moment when you should pay attention to them: the first ones may appear at the beginning of your work, the latter ones appear during your work or at the end.

Continue reading “Avoiding Typical Pitfalls (not only) at TUM”

From Thesis to Paper: My First Publication on a Scientific Conference

This post is from Roman Haas (he was advised by Elmar in his Bachelor’s Thesis).

I presented my paper about “Deriving Extract Method Refactoring Suggestions for Long Methods” which I extracted from my bachelor’s thesis  as part of the Software Quality Days 2016 conference. This post describes how I ended up at the Software Quality Days, how I prepared my presentation, what I didn’t know about conferences so far, and what I want to do differently in my next presentation.

Continue reading “From Thesis to Paper: My First Publication on a Scientific Conference”

How to Write a Case Study

Most good empirical software engineering papers that contain a study follow the same structure for its presentation. As far as I know, this structure was not invented by a single researcher, but developed gradually over the course of many publications.

Professional readers expect your case study to follow this structure, too. The audience that really matters for your publication—your thesis supervisor, his PhD advisor or program committee members—all are professional readers.

The goal of this article is to describe this structure: the basic building blocks of thesis chapters or paper sections that make up case study presentations. Continue reading “How to Write a Case Study”

How You Can Predict If Your Presentation Will Suck

As part of my roles as a PhD student, thesis supervisor and post-doc, I have literally listened to more than five hundred presentations. Unfortunately, many were very bad, making them an uncomfortable experience for both the presenter and the audience.

Over the years, I have made it a habit of asking speakers (both of good and bad presentations) whether they did a presentation rehearsal. Almost all good ones did. Without exceptions, all bad ones did not. From my experience, preparation in general and rehearsal in particular, are the most important factors influencing thesis presentation quality.

Intriguingly, this observation holds independent of whether the content is from a Bachelor’s, Master’s or PhD thesis. Rehearsal thus matters more than previous presentation experience.

This observation has been made by many others before me [1]. Then why have many, if not most of the presentations I have attended obviously not been rehearsed?

Continue reading “How You Can Predict If Your Presentation Will Suck”